I've said it before, and, if it continues to go unheard, I'll happily scream it from the rooftops again: Apple only ever does what it needs to, and no more.
Scores of those frantically refreshing liveblogs during Apple's iPhone expose yesterday may have collectively let off a groan when it was iPhone 4S, and not iPhone 5, that was unveiled to the world, but there's one question they should ask themselves it's this: why does Apple need to do anything more?
As with all product refreshes, iPhone 4S is a reaction to the moves Apple's competitors have made over the past year, and - Samsung's Galaxy S II aside - when Tim Cook looks down over the rest of the market, the number of serious challengers to iPhone's crown are few and far between.
The reason? That's simple. Android just can't compete.
Silent assault
I may be misinformed, but I very much doubt that when Google was formulating its smartphone assault, it gave much thought to Android as a consumer brand.
Android was a name to be banded around by manufacturers, developers, and the kind of astute fellows reading this article. The dear old consumer would likely never be aware of Android as a name, even if they had one in their pocket.
The shift came with the launch of Samsung's first Galaxy S in 2010 one of the first to carry consumer marketing that pushed Android as a selling point.
A response to the strength of the iPhone brand, suddenly the man on the street was offered an entire ecosystem as an alternative to iOS rather than just a new phone. This was also the point at which you attempted to sell Android phones on the number of available apps.
Problem was, though Android gave consumers looking to avoid the closed nature of iOS a brand they could invest in, that's all Android has come to mean: not iPhone.
Open and out
The reason is simple: the open nature of Android means that - as OEMs use it in various ways - it becomes all things to all men.
In this way, it's almost an anti-ecosystem.
Samsung pitches its Android devices as a high-end alternative to iPhone, while HTC goes for the middle of the market and LG - briefly - took the 3D route.
Throw into the mix budget-conscious devices from the likes of ZTE and the game-centric Xperia Play from Sony Ericsson, and you have a brand that's being stretched across multiple types of consumers at once.
A brand - it's also worth noting - Google does little to build or reinforce at a consumer level, although this may change with the Motorola deal.
Very few products successfully pitch their services at every type of customer, and Android's cause isn't aided by the fact that for many people, iPhone has become synonymous with the word smartphone.
When any product forms that kind of association think Hoover and vaccum cleaners, Jacuzzi and hot tubs, Tannoy and loudspeaker systems competitors automatically get labelled as deficient or inferior in some regard, whether they are or not.
Android has fast become that: an OS many consumers think plays second fiddle to the dominant player.
Face facts
Of course, there's nothing wrong with this.
Google never intended Android to become a brand in its own right, and to all intents and purposes, it hasn't. As an OS, it's become the most popular choice for smartphone consumers by sheer numbers without formulating any overlying brand.
Instead, the problem lies squarely with the Android manufacturers. As Motorola and LG have shown, finding space within a market crowded by scores of competing players is no easy task, even when the ecosystem as a whole is booming.
So those hoping that simply carrying the Android tag will enable their handsets to take on iPhone at the top of the charts will be disappointed: Android has little connection with the average consumer it's becoming a commodity, rather than a selling point.
Perhaps it would be best if Android reverted back to the faceless but functional OS Google initially envisioned it to be?
Instead, manufacturers need to follow Samsung's lead and foster an image of their own around their handsets, rather than the platform they run.
Until that point, Apple will continue to wheel out iPhone updates if, and when, it sees fit. After all, there's no point over-extending yourself unless the competition calls for it, is there?
Feature
With a fine eye for detail, Keith Andrew is fuelled by strong coffee, Kylie Minogue and the shapely curve of a san serif font.
Top Stories
News
Apr 18th, 2024
Fortis team boosted by top ex-King, PopCap EA, Microsoft and Warner Bros. Games talent
News
Apr 18th, 2024
UK skills crisis prompts call for games industry-led body to tackle key challenges
News
Apr 18th, 2024
AI joins the team at King: "Our challenge is to create the right amount of challenge"
News
Apr 17th, 2024
Monopoly GO! celebrates its first birthday and shares its behind-the-scenes story
Feature
Apr 15th, 2024
46 top mobile games in soft launch: CSR 3, Plants vs. Zombies 3, LEGO Hill Climb Adventures, Candy Crush Blast, and more
Feature
Apr 15th, 2024
Hot Five: XCOM Legends’ rumoured shutdown, Squad Busters verges on soft launch, and Royal Match reaches $3 billion
Events
HIT Games Conference Istanbul 2024 | Apr 18th | |
Game Job Fair – Spring Edition 2024 | Nordic | Apr 18th |
Arts DAO Fest 2.0 | Middle East | Apr 20th |
App Promotion Summit London | Europe | Apr 25th |
Esports Future Summit | Middle East | Apr 27th |
Dubai GameExpo Summit 2024 | Middle East | May 1st |
The MENA Games Industry Awards 2024 | Middle East | May 2nd |
GameDev Atlantic 2024 | May 4th |