News

Bluffing in games is difficult, says TinyBuild's Mike Rose

Bluffing in games is difficult, says TinyBuild's Mike Rose

Mike Rose, formerly of this parish and now of TinyBuild, made it abundantly clear on stage at GDC Europe that bluffing is difficult to introduce to videogames.

Despite the mechanic’s prevalence in the tabletop scene, Rose argued that the nature of video games makes bluffing difficult. But there are ways to introduce the principles into a game nevertheless.

Table top tactics

Discussing the influences behind his talk, Rose explained how the prevalence of bluffing in board and paper games stands in stark contrast to the video games scene.

“I’ve been playing tonnes of card and board games recently…and they’ve made me realise all the bluffing and misdirection in them isn’t really in video games”, he said.

Describing bluffing as “not just lying; you’re roleplaying some kind of falseness or falsehood”, Rose emphasised that the social dynamic of playing a game in the same room as other people actively encouraged the bluffer’s art.

From getting players to take on hidden roles successfully in games like The Resistance to mastering your poker face, Rose said “Bluffing creates tense interactions, it creates a lot of unexpected situations.”

And in that position, being forced to look someone in the eye, call their bluff and live with the consequences only raises the excitement further.

Anti-social video games

But, in news that’ll likely delight moral panic fans across the world, Rose cited the tendency of videogames to lack the social power of face to face interaction as a key reason why bluffing rarely works in games.

“There aren’t the social moves you can see…that’s really important for these kind of games and we don’t have them in videogames”, he said.

“All the behaviours you make are meaningless [without that social location] and you don’t have the context, so there isn’t the excitement that is prevalent in table top games.”

Rose suggested that the spirit of deception could feature in games – provided they had clear rules.

“Randomness doesn’t seem to work very well. There needs to be a set of rules and everyone needs to understand them…Everyone needs to be fixed to set off the bluff.”

And by providing that clear rule set while accepting the limitations of games without social elements, Rose believes that there is a real opportunity for game developers to make the most of intrigue.


Staff Writer

George Osborn (no, not that one) has been ensnared by PocketGamer.biz to write words for them on pain of death/in return for money. He works with the events team to produce pitch perfect editorial for Pocket Gamer's ever-expanding events schedule, as well as working on advice features and articles to help game developers make the most of mobile.

Comments

No comments
View options
  • Order by latest to oldest
  • Order by oldest to latest
  • Show all replies