Talk to any small iPhone developer and they'll tell you about the meritocracy of the App Store, and how it enables them to compete with the big boys.
Indeed, some publishers have commented that the App Store hasn't been as easy to deal with as they had hoped.
Glu's outgoing CEO Greg Ballard notably said, "It [App Store] hasn't been the home run for big publishers as was expected."
Week-on-week however, 14 months after the App Stores launch, EA Mobile and Gameloft are coming to dominate the market, as they have global mobile game decks.
Since July 2009, they've typically had around 20 games in the US Top 100. This week it's up to 25, with EA Mobile lengthening its lead over its French rival 15 games to 10.
Does Apple care?
Indeed, you could also almost paint Apple into the role of neglectful network operator.
Of course, it doesn't make the demands that mobile operators do concerning content. Other than technical ones, it doesn't really make any demands at all.
In fact, you could argue that just as the mobile operators didn't care about mobile games and so didn't do anything to change the market dynamics - it was massive fragmentation, bad discovery, and high cost of games that led to EA Mobile and Gameloft's domination because they had the licences and the scale - so Apple is similarly doing nothing to change market dynamics by tacitly encouraging the drop to a standard 99c price for non-licenced iPhone games.
It could change the way the chart is constructed so it's based on value of sales not just the number of downloads for example.
99c isn't sustainable
The increasing problem is the 99c games are only type of games open to small developers and hence this is where we're seeing the most congestion in terms of too many releases and hardly any profits unless youre selling hundreds of thousands of games.
Of course, this isn't to say that small developers and publishers can't find success.
A few have, as has been proved by the likes of Chillingo, Backflip Studios, and Skyworks. Significantly though, very few have managed to combine good chart position with an average portfolio price higher than $2.
The only two I can think of are PopCap Games and Firemint; one of which is a specialist licenced-based casual publisher and the other took a big risk on a very technically advanced game (Real Racing).
It's just not a sustainable model for the vast majority of developers or publishers.
The end result will either be that developers will go bust or move onto other platforms where they can charge more for their games, or spread the cost of development.
That's device fragmentation by another name, and we all know where that leads; licenses and big publishers like EA Mobile and Gameloft.
Feature
Contributing Editor
A Pocket Gamer co-founder, Jon is Contributing Editor at PG.biz which means he acts like a slightly confused uncle who's forgotten where he's left his glasses. As well as letters and cameras, he likes imaginary numbers and legumes.
Top Stories
Feature
Apr 23rd, 2024
King’s Trevor Burrows on the power of art: "We could see our numbers literally dropping"
Feature
Apr 22nd, 2024
Tjodolf Sommestad talks AI, tips for indie devs, and a day in the life of King's president
Events
App Promotion Summit London | Europe | Apr 25th |
Esports Future Summit | Middle East | Apr 27th |
Dubai GameExpo Summit 2024 | Middle East | May 1st |
The MENA Games Industry Awards 2024 | Middle East | May 2nd |
GameDev Atlantic 2024 | May 4th | |
Mobidictum Meetup Berlin May 2024 | Europe | May 7th |
Mobidictum Meetup Tallinn May 2024 | Europe | May 21st |
Israel Mobile Summit 2024 | Middle East | Jun 6th |
Popular Stories
News
Apr 17th, 2024
Monopoly GO! celebrates its first birthday and shares its behind-the-scenes story
News
Apr 23rd, 2024