It's always dangerous to assume a legal ruling in a specific case can be applied to a wide range of general cases.
This certainly appears to have be the situation in the reference ruling from the Court of Justice of the European Union in the case of UsedSoft versus Oracle.
Big guns
The specifics of this case came about because German company UsedSoft is reselling licences for Oracle's software, something the US company said was illegal.
Some particular aspects were that the agreement for Oracle's software allowed up to 25 users to access the server-based software, downloading the software and unlocking it via licences (effectively keys).
It was these that UsedSoft was reselling.
However, the court ruled that the first sale in the EU of a copy of a computer program means the copyright holder loses the right to oppose the resale of that copy.
This right to resale has always been the case with the physical distribution via CD or DVD, and this has now been extended to digital distribution.
Indeed, the ruling also points out that the copyright holder can't restrict access to updates of the software for users who have bought resold software.
This is the case even if the original maintenance agreement was for a limited period. The copyright holder has to allow the customer access to updates for an unlimited period.
On the other hand
Yet there are plenty of caveats.
This ruling is only in the case of a client-server and licence key distribution and so doesn't apply to online services. Also, in the case of the 25 licences in the Oracle software example, a company can't buy a license for 30 users, use 25 themselves and resell the additional 5 licences. It's an all or nothing process.
Once software is resold, the seller must remove it from their computer.
And most importantly, the court says the copyright holder can use legitimate technical means, such as encryption, to prevent software being downloaded again.
"A copyright holder such as Oracle is entitled, in the event of the resale of a user licence entailing the resale of a copy of a computer program downloaded from his website, to ensure by all technical means at his disposal that the copy is made unusable," the ECJ said.
Finally, it should be pointed out that the actual case - currently running in German Federal Court of Justice - is yet to be heard.
All-in-all then, it seems that games publishers and platforms will be able to continue to restrict the reselling of digital content as they always have done, even though users in the EU now have a right - if not the means - to resell that content.
[source: Out-law / Court of Justice release (PDF)]
News
Contributing Editor
A Pocket Gamer co-founder, Jon is Contributing Editor at PG.biz which means he acts like a slightly confused uncle who's forgotten where he's left his glasses. As well as letters and cameras, he likes imaginary numbers and legumes.
Top Stories
News
Apr 17th, 2024
Scopely is celebrating Monopoly GO!'s first birthday with in-game events and rewards
News
Apr 17th, 2024
Learn about the state of play in MENA and the changing payments landscape at the Dubai GameExpo Summit
News
Apr 17th, 2024
Monopoly GO! celebrates its first birthday and shares its behind-the-scenes story
Feature
Apr 15th, 2024
46 top mobile games in soft launch: CSR 3, Plants vs. Zombies 3, LEGO Hill Climb Adventures, Candy Crush Blast, and more
Feature
Apr 15th, 2024
Hot Five: XCOM Legends’ rumoured shutdown, Squad Busters verges on soft launch, and Royal Match reaches $3 billion
Events
HIT Games Conference Istanbul 2024 | Apr 18th | |
Game Job Fair – Spring Edition 2024 | Nordic | Apr 18th |
Arts DAO Fest 2.0 | Middle East | Apr 20th |
App Promotion Summit London | Europe | Apr 25th |
Esports Future Summit | Middle East | Apr 27th |
Dubai GameExpo Summit 2024 | Middle East | May 1st |
The MENA Games Industry Awards 2024 | Middle East | May 2nd |
Mobidictum Meetup Berlin May 2024 | Europe | May 7th |