Whatever your feelings on the growth of the free-to-play market, there's no question that in-app purchases in mobile games are here to stay - at least for the next few years.
However, the increasing number of freemium apps aimed at young children has attracted the attention of The Office of Fair Trading (OFT).
In fact, the OFT is so concerned about the possibility of game-playing youngsters being unlawfully manipulated into buying expensive IAPs that it's launched an investigation into the matter.
Specifically, the consumer protection agency is interested in identifying "potentially misleading or commercially aggressive practices" within freemium games, and holding the companies responsible to account.
Get 'em while they're young
According to the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008, it is illegal to make games which include "direct exhortations" to children.
This means that games targeted at minors cannot contain "strong encouragement to make a purchase".
Developers are also forbidden from creating mechanics that will "necessitate making a purchase", or direct kids to "persuade their parents or other adults to make a purchase for them".
Cavendish Elithorn of the OFT said: "We are concerned that children and their parents could be subject to unfair pressure to purchase when they are playing games they thought were free, but which can actually run up substantial costs."
Headline grabber
The practice of putting expensive in-app purchases in child-centric games has been grabbing headlines of late, with Apple having recently proposed an in-app purchase refund system in the US to placate parents.
Indeed, it can likely be no coincidence that, almost five years after the App Store launched, only now is the OFT looking to take action.
But just what form will that action take?
"The OFT is not seeking to ban in-game purchases," Elithorn added, "but the games industry must ensure it is complying with the relevant regulations so that children are protected."
"We are speaking to the industry and will take enforcement action if necessary."
At this stage, the OFT cannot identify the companies that are subject to this investigation.
News
Video Editor
Enchanted from a young age by colour, motion, and sound, James divides his time between obsessing over all things digital and lamenting the death of VHS. He looks forward to a future where machines rule the earth and all political disputes are solved via one round of rock-paper-scissors.
Related Articles
Top Stories
News
2 hours, 2 minutes ago
Keywords, Active Fence, Take This, and Modulate create Gaming Safety Coalition
News
Mar 18th, 2024
SuperScale's ebook serves organic growth tips, making mobile games more sustainable
Feature
1 hour, 14 minutes ago
Game Analysis: Deconstructing Jelly Run 2048 - Boosting rewarded ads and retention with a new meta
Feature
Mar 18th, 2024
Hot Five: Monopoly GO’s next-level UA, Supercell’s psychological analysis, and AI use for NPC dialogue
Events
MIX & Kinda Funny Showcase 2024 | North America | Mar 14th |
Game Developers Conference 2024 | North America | Mar 18th |
#notGDC 2024 | Mar 18th | |
Day of the Devs: San Francisco | North America | Mar 18th |
Nvidia GTC 2024 | North America | Mar 18th |
Game Connection America 2024 | Europe | Mar 18th |
Pocket Gamer Connects San Francisco 2024 | North America | Mar 18th |
European Game Showcase 2024 | North America | Mar 19th |
Popular Stories
Interview
Mar 12th, 2024
Supercell’s Head of Live Games Sara Bach talks company changes, world-beating live ops, and how to get back on top
News
Mar 13th, 2024
Monopoly GO makes $2 billion in 10 months with "less than a quarter" of that spent on UA
News
Mar 15th, 2024