Perhaps intentionally, Sterne Agee analyst Arvind Bhatia's suggestion that social gaming giant Zynga is losing $150 on every new paying user it acquires was always likely to prove controversial.
Bhatia's allegation which illustrated his belief Zynga is spending too much on user acquisition was loosely based on Zynga's own figures for the September quarter.
The studio spent a total of $120 million on sales and marketing, according to Bhatia, attracting a net total of 400,000 new paying players, each spending an average of $150 a figure that, in theory, means Zynga is spending $150 more than it gets back per user.
It's a formula that plenty have already taken issue with, and NaturalMotion CEO Torsten Reil has gone even further to suggest that, rather than losing money, Zynga actually makes $30 from every new user it attracts.
Figures don't figure
Reil claims Bhatia has made a fundamental error when it comes to calculating just how many new users Zynga's games acquired.
"Over a period of nine months, Zynga like all social games companies - will lose a proportion of paying users through normal attrition," Reil told investor website Founderware.
"Let's say that this attrition rate is approximately 20 percent - may actually be higher or lower. With a base rate of 3 million users, thats a loss of about 600,000 during the period."
Reil therefore concludes that, given Zynga ended the September quarter with 3.4 million paying users, it actually attracted 1 million new players rather than the 400,000 Bhatia originally suggested.
User issues
Such a miscalculation completely distorts the picture as to how much return Zynga makes per users, says Reil.
"With a $120 million marketing spend, this obviously equates to an acquisition cost of $120 per new paying user. And with an average revenue per paying user of $150, it means Zynga are actually generating $30 of net revenue per user," he concludes.
"Obviously, all of these calculations are back-of-the envelope. Not all of the $120 million marketing spend will be for user acquisition. And not all of the new users are acquired through marketing - Words With Friends being one example of a successful non-marketing acquisition channel."
Others have backed up Reil's view that Bhatia's understanding of marketing spend is flawed, highlighting the misnomer that all such funds are solely spent on acquiring new users.
[source: Founderware]
News
With a fine eye for detail, Keith Andrew is fuelled by strong coffee, Kylie Minogue and the shapely curve of a san serif font.
Related Articles
Top Stories
News
Jun 2nd, 2024
PocketGamer.biz Podcast Week in Mobile Games E14 -Supercell's Squad Busters goes global and why Steam does discoverability better than mobile
News
May 31st, 2024
Week in Views - Squad Busters goes global, broken app stores, and Hill Climb Racing gets the LEGO treatment
News
May 31st, 2024
Mobile Movers: All the latest appointments and job moves from around the industry
Events
Dev Play Conference 2024 | Europe | Jun 3rd |
Games Mental Health Summit 2024 | Europe | Jun 3rd |
Gotland Game Conference 2024 | Nordic | Jun 3rd |
Tribeca Games Festival 2024 | North America | Jun 5th |
Guerrilla Collective 2024 | North America | Jun 6th |
Israel Mobile Summit 2024 | Middle East | Jun 6th |
Angles 24 Freeplay Conference | Australasia | Jun 6th |
PitchYaGame Live 2024 | Jun 7th |