A Google internal policy presentation has been published, revealing a discussion about the advantages of giving certain companies, such as Motorola and Verizon, preferential status over the open source Android OS.
The presentation came to light after a judge presiding over the Oracle versus Google patent infringement case published it.
Florian Mueller of FOSS Patents has detailed the publication.
"Oracle v. Google is a treasure trove of information about Google's Android-related dealings," Mueller said.
Airing the dirty laundry
Titled "If we gave it away, how can we ensure we get to benefit from it?" the presentation details policies such as "Do not develop in the open. Instead, make source code available after innovation is complete."
The second bullet point of the presentation reads "lead device concept: Give early access to the software to partners who build and distribute devices to our specification (ie, Motorola and Verizon). They get a non-contractual time to market advantage and in return they align to our standard."
Mueller is in no doubt that these policies will damage Googles relationship with its other licensees.
"Can you imagine that a company like Samsung, HTC, LG or Sony could still trust Google in this regard if Google actually competes with them through a subsidiary [of Motorola Mobility]?" He said.
He added that it "removes whatever little doubt anyone had left that Google certainly plays favourites with certain Android OEMs, and if the MMI deal goes through, it will play favourites with only one: its own subsidiary, of course."
Overhead complexity
Indeed, as many commentators pointed out when the proposed Google acquisition of Motorola was announced, it would likely cause problems for licencees.
Since then, Samsung has released the second version of its bada OS, also highlighting its advantages over Android to developers.
Microsoft is also wooing OEMs and developers to its Window Phone OS.
It also seems that Anssi Vanjoki's (Nokia) prestigious statement that using Android was equivalent to pissing in your pants to keep warm, may be coming true, as licensees are finding that getting in bed with Google doesnt necessarily mean an equal relationship.
It also goes some way to answer the question "Does a company like Google spend $12.5 billion just to do a standard vanilla deal?", posed right here at Pocket Gamer.biz.
[source: Foss Patents]
News
When Matt was 7 years old he didn't write to Santa like the other little boys and girls. He wrote to Mario. When the rotund plumber replied, Matt's dedication to a life of gaming was established. Like an otaku David Carradine, he wandered the planet until becoming a writer at Pocket Gamer.
Top Stories
as
News
May 15th, 2024
Nexon banks on $22bn IP Dungeon & Fighter being a mobile hit in China as Q1 revenue declines
Feature
5 hours, 11 minutes ago
Behind the scenes: How adding sandwich offers to an idle merge game boosted three metrics at once
as
Feature
6 hours, 38 minutes ago
Honor of Kings set for June 20th global launch after $15 billion+ revenue in China
Feature
May 14th, 2024
Matej Lančarič's Squad Busters deep dive: Under the skin of 2024's biggest launch yet
Events
Mobidictum Meetup Berlin May 2024 | Europe | May 16th |
Valencia Indie Summit 2024 | Europe | May 16th |
Digital Dragons | Europe | May 19th |
GamesBeat Summit 2024 | North America | May 20th |
Mobidictum Meetup Tallinn May 2024 | Europe | May 21st |
Nordic Game Spring 2024 | Nordic | May 21st |
Impact 2024 - Indie Games | May 23rd | |
MomoCon 2024 | North America | May 24th |